true

BD Insyte Autoguard™ Shielded IV Catheter

Advance safety at the push of a button

Carousel Image
BD Insyte Autoguard™ Shielded IV Catheter

Ready to learn more? Let’s have a conversation.

Loading
Overview

The BD Insyte Autoguard™ and BD Insyte-N™ Autoguard™ Shielded IV Catheters is designed to provide safety activation with a push of a button and is completely encapsulated after activation to help reduce the risk of needlestick injury. BD  Instaflash™ Needle Technology is designed to confirm immediate vessel entry at the point of insertion and to help improve first-stick success.

true
Features and Benefits

Enhanced safety

The use of safety engineered devices and proper education can lead up to a 9.2% reduction in sharps injuries. The Insyte  Autoguard™ Shielded IV Catheter is designed to provide safety activation with a push of a button and is completely encapsulated after activation to reduce the risk of needlestick injury.

First-stick success

Instaflash™ Needle Technology, available on 20, 22 and 24 gauge sizes, incorporates a notched needle, which has clinically demonstrated improved first-attempt insertion success, reducing painful hit-and-miss insertions.^,1-2
^Compared to a non-notched needle

Minimized phlebitis

Proprietary BD Vialon™ Catheter Material softens, enabling longer dwell time and reducing the chance of phlebitis up to 69%.*,3-5
*Compared to an FEP catheter 

Reference

1.  van Loon FHJ, Timmerman R, den Brok GPH, Korsten EHM, Dierick-van Daele ATM, Bouwman ARA. The impact of a notched peripheral intravenous catheter on the first attempt success rate in hospitalized adults: block-randomized trial. JVA. 2021 DOI: 10.1177/1129729821990217.

2. Seetharam AM, Raju U, Suresh K. A randomized controlled study to compare first stick success with Instaflash technology: The FIRSST study. JVA. 2022 DOI:10.1177/11297298221080369.

3. Gaukroger PB, Roberts JG, Manners TA. Infusion thrombophlebitis: a prospective comparison of 645 Vialon and Teflon cannulae in anaesthetic and postoperative use. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 1988;16:265-271.

4. Kus B, Buyukyilmaz F. Effectiveness of Vialon biomaterial versus Teflon catheters for peripheral intravenous placement: A randomized clinical trial. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020;e12328. 

5. Maki DG, Ringer M. Risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with small peripheral venous catheters. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1991;114:845-854.

BD-112349 (03/24)

true
BD Insyte-N™ Autoguard™ Shielded IV Catheter
  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard-N Straight, 24G x 0.56"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard-N Winged, 24G x 0.56"

BD Insyte Autoguard™ Shielded IV Catheter
  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Winged, 16G x 1.77"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Winged, 16G x 1.16"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Winged, 18G x 1.88"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Winged, 20G x 1.88"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Winged, 18G x 1.16"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Winged, 20G x 1.16"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Winged, 20G x 1.00"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Winged, 22G x 1.00"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Straight, 14G x 1.77"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Winged, 24G x 0.75"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Straight, 16G x 1.77"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Straight, 16G x 1.16"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Straight, 18G x 1.88"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Straight, 18G x 1.16"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Straight, 20G x 1.88"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Straight, 20G x 1.00"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Straight, 20G x 1.16"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Straight, 22G x 1.00"

  • product-image

    Insyte Autoguard Straight, 24G x 0.75"

References

1.  van Loon FHJ, Timmerman R, den Brok GPH, Korsten EHM, Dierick-van Daele ATM, Bouwman ARA. The impact of a notched peripheral intravenous catheter on the first attempt success rate in hospitalized adults: block-randomized trial. JVA. 2021 DOI: 10.1177/1129729821990217.

2. Seetharam AM, Raju U, Suresh K. A randomized controlled study to compare first stick success with Instaflash technology: The FIRSST study. JVA. 2022 DOI:10.1177/11297298221080369.

3. Gaukroger PB, Roberts JG, Manners TA. Infusion thrombophlebitis: a prospective comparison of 645 Vialon and Teflon cannulae in anaesthetic and postoperative use. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 1988;16:265-271.

4. Kus B, Buyukyilmaz F. Effectiveness of Vialon biomaterial versus Teflon catheters for peripheral intravenous placement: A randomized clinical trial. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020;e12328. 

5. Maki DG, Ringer M. Risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with small peripheral venous catheters. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1991;114:845-854.

BD-112349 (03/24)

true
Resources